Sociological review of the movie Borat Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Sociological review of the celluloid Borat - Essay ExampleSet in a objective style, the narrative begins in a small village where Borat introduces his family and village to the audience. Borat is soon asked by the government of Kazakhstan to encounter The United States of America in order to learn the cultural roots of the most powerful republic in the world. He would then bring back his learnings, as a form of a documentary, and teach the Central Asian nation, a part of former Soviet Union, the American Way. With a exceptional budget, an obese sidekick as a producer of the documentary (Azamat Bagatov played by Ken Davitian), Borat sets off-key to meet real Americans. His zigzag journey across different states, his responses to American culture and vice-versa (Americas reaction to Borat) is on one side a comical riot but on the other playscript exposes the prejudices and hypocrisies in the American culture. As Borat is capable to see the world only from his own cultural view point, the film at solitary level is a story of ethnocentrism gone crazy. His values, beliefs, and norms are quite a standoff and offensive at first, but sadly depict the realities of multiculturalism in the US (Lee). This write-up aims to review the movie from a sociology point of view, illustrating the interfaces of sociological theories with movies account and themes. Ethnocentrism I believe that the central sociological surmise in the movie Borat. Ethnocentrism is the practice of comparing other cultural practices with your own and often finding them inferior. cultural divide, being the main theme of the movie, is practically embedded in almost all scenes both from American and Kazakhi points of views (Robert Brym). Sacha Boren demonstrates this in the famous rodeo scene in Texas where he enters the ring to praise the power of America, its decision to fill Iraq and cursing the enemies of America. He is met with rounds of applause and cheers. However, he stretches his act by singing the national anthem of Kazakhstan on American tune calling it the greatest solid ground in the world. The idea that some other country beats the United States in glory and power does not go well with the audience as it responds with loud jeers and boos. The incident hints ethnocentrism being rooted in American culture and perhaps the root of unhomogeneous prejudices Americans have against other cultures and nationalities (Lalo). Conflict theory Another principle theory that is reflective in the movie slump from the start is Karl Marxs Conflict theory that defines conflicts in social structures as the main number one wood of the progressive development in greater equality, democracy, autonomy and individuality (Sociology Guide). The conflict between races (especially Jews) is apparent right from the start of the movie. Many DVD versions of the movie have the following language options English, French, Spanish, Russian and Hebrew. If you select Hebrew, you would observe a repeated warning, Jew invocinity, Jew invocinity, as the screen flashes the following messages You have been trapped Jew forbid your claws where they can be seen. Do not attempt shift your shape. And this is all before the movie withal begins. Borat Sagdiyev lives in a world that believes Jews to have horns on their head. A