Philosophy

In The Morality of Happiness , Annas explains that morality in antediluvial times was non socially imposed hardly independently derived as a consequence of face-to-face reflexion tight an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to w be up this earn . This will guide , not compete but explain Annas s representation of Aristotle s of morals . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this essay is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is good in her explanation of Aristotle , the concluding paragraphs of this essay will curtly address some of the implications of Aristotle s ethicsAccording to Aristotle , honourable considerations be not for all(prenominal) ace ethics begins as a quest for a better life . Those who are satisfied with their lives or preter mit the ability to radiate on their lives sewernot shoot in the considerateness that is necessary for usefulness . spring chicken masses cannot reside in ethics because they capture lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , muckle who are so busy with their lives or do not look at the opportunity for leisure cannot have in ethics because they do not have the time that is inevitable for expression . Ethics is not for such people . For people to practice or acquire in ethical activeness , tierce things must occur . First , people should be disgruntled with their lives . This may seem a rather singular way to panorama at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot quest for in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people must require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be complacent most their situations if they are to engage in what passes for et hical activities . Thirdly dissatisfied peop! le should reflect on ways of living that may be considered improvement over their present conditions . Their reflections should be apt in to define for ethical .

Only individuals who fulfill these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the objective of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reflection on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to and if know what to do Ancient ethics is not to the highest period knowing what to do . It is more about acting on knowing what to do . The teleos (end ) or ending of ethical reflection is to act sensiblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the noetic reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) objective it must be tell at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed rational reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions Deliberate acting is necessary because it is the only kind of human...If you want to get a full essay, launch it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper